Look at these heels! Could the disciplinarian not just have waited the extra minute for these to be removed? But take a gander at the Top. She's not dressed in fetish or glam.....and yet check out those red pumps! Somebody on this shoot is into heels!
It's bad enough that standard porn shots do this all of the time, but spanking shots too? And it's not just the glam shots either. Even relatively average ladies in seemingly domestic settings engage in this:
I guess these boots were meant for spanking?
And it's not just a youth-thing! Mature victims keep those shoes on as well.......
Sometimes I think the photographers use shoes as a sort of 'partial costume' to remind the viewer "who" the victim is. A good example of this is the punished "schoolgirl". And here's a whole line-up:
On one hand, everyone wants to see those nubile cuties all nice and naked.....BUT we also have to keep that 'schoolgirl' image going, so what better way than to let them keep their uniform socks and shoes on? ( Don't those shoes just utterly convince you that these are girls in a school? LOL)
But shoes are not always a uniform or clue. So why are they there after everything else has been stripped off? And it doesn't matter who the spanker is. They can be male......
He probably couldn't figure out how to get them off.
"Owww, but black goes with everything!"
"I'll know you've had enough when those fall off."
...or more maternal:
"Those are my pumps, young lady...........and I'm going to keep spanking you until you
give them back to me!"
Hell, sometimes the spanker can even be in full 'Domme regalia' and their victim's shoes are still staying put:
This shot is a bit silly on more levels than just shoe-wearing.....but if you are shooting for 'ridiculous', you may as well add shoes (and socks) to the list.
But the best is when both spanker and spankee are naked....or nearly naked.....and those damned shoes are still on!
Shots like this just make me laugh!
So what is up with this? OK, it's not 100%......but as you can see, it's frequent enough to have to be intentional. Do people find this sexy? Do the models have ugly feet that need to be hidden? Did the model initially remove her shoes only to have everyone on the shoot think someone opened a bag of Dorito's? What the hell is it? I realize this is not a new thing:
This trend goes back a bit for sure. (And don't you just love the rifle stock visible in the upper right corner? You don't see that anymore. I guess she's lucky she's just being hand-spanked!)
Maybe it's the shoes themselves. I've always heard that women love shoes. Perhaps even naked women still can't resist shoes?
It seems that this young lady can't.
The ONLY time you don't see shoes on an otherwise naked spankee, seems to be when that victim is male! And here I thought it was women who were more prone to wanting to go around barefoot?